Alghamdi, Qusay Ahmed and Alharbi, Rakan Inad and Harbi, Omar Jizza Al and Aldossri, Nouf Shafi and Algharrash, Mariam Ahmed and Alsoqiani, Majed Zaar and Almalki, Mohammed A and Alotaibi, Mohammed Nasser and Olayan, Mohammed Saad and Alqahtani, Abdulaziz Farraj and DOLQOO, SHURUQ ABDULLH (2025) Prevalence of suboptimal frontal chest radiography in PSMMC. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences, 22 (2). pp. 369-377. ISSN 2582-5542
![WJBPHS-2025-0345.pdf [thumbnail of WJBPHS-2025-0345.pdf]](https://eprint.scholarsrepository.com/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
WJBPHS-2025-0345.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Abstract
Background: Suboptimal frontal chest X-rays (CXRs) can impede accurate diagnosis and delay treatment, highlighting the need to assess their prevalence and identify solutions to improve image quality. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of suboptimal CXRs at a tertiary hospital and propose strategies to enhance radiographic standards. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 505 frontal CXRs was conducted. Each image was classified as adequate or suboptimal based on criteria established by the American College of Radiology (ACR) and European guidelines. Parameters such as patient rotation and inspiratory volume were evaluated to identify technical deficiencies. Statistical analysis was performed to assess associations between patient gender and image quality. Results: The study revealed that 25.7% of CXRs exhibited improper patient rotation, and 25.1% had inadequate inspiratory volume, indicating significant technical shortcomings. No significant association was found between patient gender and image quality. Suboptimal CXRs were prevalent, potentially compromising diagnostic accuracy and patient care. Conclusions: Suboptimal CXRs are common and may hinder effective diagnosis and treatment. To address this, we recommend strengthening CXR acquisition protocols, implementing robust quality control measures, providing technologist re-training, and integrating artificial intelligence (AI) tools for automated quality assessment. These measures can improve radiographic standards and enhance patient outcomes.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2025.22.2.0345 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | CXR; Radiographic techniques; Radiograph acquisition; Interpretation of a radiograph |
Depositing User: | Editor WJBPHS |
Date Deposited: | 20 Aug 2025 11:51 |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://eprint.scholarsrepository.com/id/eprint/3767 |