Ahsan, Muhammad (2025) Beyond boundaries: Comparative perspectives on attributional and consequential life cycle assessment. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 15 (3). pp. 1582-1584. ISSN 2582-8185
![IJSRA-2025-1921.pdf [thumbnail of IJSRA-2025-1921.pdf]](https://eprint.scholarsrepository.com/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
IJSRA-2025-1921.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
Abstract
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is widely regarded as the most comprehensive methodology for evaluating the environmental impacts of products and systems. Two principal modeling approaches have emerged within the LCA discipline: attributional LCA (ALCA) and consequential LCA (CLCA). While ALCA aims to describe the environmental burden associated with the production and use of a product under existing conditions, CLCA seeks to capture the system-wide environmental consequences of a decision or change. This paper presents a structured literature review of the evolution, methodological distinctions, applications, and ongoing debates surrounding ALCA and CLCA. By comparing key studies, standardization efforts, and recent sector-specific applications, we highlight the strengths and limitations of each approach and outline recommendations for future research and practice.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.15.3.1921 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Attributional LCA; Consequential LCA; GHG Protocol Standard; Environment; Carbon |
Depositing User: | Editor IJSRA |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jul 2025 15:24 |
Related URLs: | |
URI: | https://eprint.scholarsrepository.com/id/eprint/2540 |